Your questions answered – Subscriber Q & A - Jan 2010 | Print |

 

21 January 2010

 

Dear Fellow Investor

 

During my recent visit to South Africa my dad asked for help with his finances.

What I, at first thought will be easy, turned out the be very difficult.

My father turns 74 this year, is retired and thus lives off his investments. His investments are quite liquid at the moment and his questions were mostly about how much money to allocate to what asset classes i.e. bonds, equities and how much cash to hold.

Personally I have not given the matter a lot of thought as when I am not invested in shares I hold cash. But with me at turning 43 this year I still have quite a long working life ahead of me to make up for any substantial losses.

When thinking about my fathers asset allocation my thinking went more to ask if he should have any shares at all.

But the biggest risk my father, and all of us face, is inflation. Because none of us know how long we will live. It is really quite frustrating not knowing this because it makes planning so difficult but knowing that may cause more problems than it solves...

I am still doing research and will let you know what I will recommend to my dad.

I have found a great source of high quality articles that has been very helpful.

Take a look at:
How much money can you prudently take out of your investments in retirement?

Fine tuning your asset allocation

Drawdowns: Losing money is no fun



In this weeks newsletter I answer few questions I have received from readers. I hope you find the answers of value.
 

Do you try to time the market?
All the really long term studies I have read said that the market cannot be timed. That hasn't stopped me from trying, but without success.

I now stick to simple things have worked for me in the past.

  • I look for undervalued companies
  • I analyse them
  • I buy them
  • I wait for the value to be realised
  • I sell

I do not recommend it, but should you want to give market timing a try, put aside a small percentage of your portfolio, say no more than 5%, and give it a try.


How do I choose long term investments?
This question pre-supposes that I also trade and this is not the case at all.

 All my investments are for the long-term but I am not averse to selling shortly after buying, if the value has been realised or if I find a more attractive opportunity.

In the article How do you select investments I explain my investment process in more detail.


Do you look at the general economic indicators and commentary?
I am not the kind investor that looks at the overall economic situation and then decides where to invest. 

I make all my investments from a company perspective. When I find and under valued investment I like and I buy without really taking the overall economic situation into account.

I do however find it is difficult for me to completely ignore the economic climate when making my investment decisions.

For example at the moment I'm careful about my position sizing and the amount of money I have invested in shares as I haven't seen clear signs that the world economy has turned around and that unemployment is stabilising.


Why do investment strategies fail?

This is a difficult question to answer.

I think the main reason why most investment strategies fail is that the strategy was not based on sound research that has proven to be successful over long periods of time, and with that I mean multiple market cycles.

When a strategy under-performs you have determine if the strategy never had a chance of working (example day trading) or if the strategy is just not working in the current market climate.

Please keep in mind that there will always be certain market phases when all strategies under-perform. Sometimes even for a few years. Abandoning a sound strategy in a period of under-performance may be exactly the wrong thing to do.

The best example of this would be value investors abandoning their value investment strategy just before the Internet bubble burst because they were completely unsuccessful for the two or three years that the bubble was inflating.

I am a pure value investor. The strategy makes sense to me, and has over time given me excellent returns.

If you are new to investing or still have not found an investment strategy you feel comfortable with I suggest you, read as much as you can find on the different investment strategies, looking only at strategies with proven long term track records. Decide which one suits you best and slowly, with small amounts of money at first, start applying the strategy.

And forget about not using real money for this. Nothing focuses the mind and forces you to learn as much as possible than having your own money in the market.

Make adjustments as you learn and, if you feel comfortable, expand your activities.


With the market having recovered so far already are you changing your strategy?
I will not say that I'm changing my investment strategy but I am becoming more careful.

The advantage of being a value investor is that as the overall market moves higher attractive ideas become harder to find or the opportunities you do find is low quality businesses.

If I cannot find anything compelling to invest in I stay in cash.

What I am finding though is that there are a few industries that have completely been left behind by the market.

Telecommunications for example, companies in this sector are trading at extremely high dividend yields. Were for example can you find companies with yields of between 7% to 9% with a relatively stable business even in these times.

Everyone is worried about future growth, but at these yields theses companies are not priced as if there will ever be any growth.


Do you use technical analysis?
Even though technical analysis played an important role in my investment learning process I do not use it much any more.

Shortly after I started investing I read a lot of books on the subject and thought I have discovered the holy grail of investing.

Shortly thereafter I lost a substantial amount of money investing in gold shares using just technical analysis.

After that I further studied technical analysis looking for long term academical studies and the results achieved. I quickly discovered that there is no real track record of technical analysis to speak of. Furthermore  there is no really successful investor that you can point to and say that he made his money using technical analysis.

There is no Warren Buffett of technical analysis.

That does not mean that I don't use technical analysis of all. I may still look at a graph to see where the price is compared to highs and lows and also what the trend in the price movement is.

Try as I may have been unable not to look at charts as it has become such an ingrained part of my investment approach over the last 20 years.


Do you hold cash and if so how much?
I don't make any decisions as to the amount of cash I hold. The amount of cash in my portfolio is always the residual amount after I bought all the companies I found undervalued and worthy of investment.

That said I always try to keep are part of my portfolio, say up to 20%, in cash so that I have funds available should extraordinary investment opportunities come along.


How do you size the positions in your portfolio?
I've written about this in an article called How concentrated should you be.

To summarise, I usually try to size my position so that I can have a portfolio of no more than 30 positions. 

Because I know that my investment decisions are not perfect and that company valuation is an imprecise art I always try to be on the conservative side and keep the amount of damage a large loss on a position can do to my portfolio to a minimum.

I hardly ever have more than 30 positions as I have found that it then becomes really hard to keep track of all the positions.

As large companies are usually made up of multiple businesses I may invest a larger percentage of my portfolio in them compared to small companies where they just have one line of business that can easily be severely impacted.

 

Like what you have read?

Sign up for our free newsletter and receive articles like this in your inbox weekly

And if you sign up now you will also receive a 11 page free report - Enhanced Checklist for Investors - with over 30 proven checklist items to improve your investment performance


Privacy Policy

 

Do you hedge at all? And if so with what instruments?
As a general rule I don't hedge. 

What I have done in the past is buy out of the money but options if I felt that a market correction was imminent. My timing was usually dreadful and most of the options expired worthless. 

For that reason, if I do something like that, I invest only a really small part of my portfolio say 0.5%.

I have thought a lot about short selling but have ever gotten round to do anything about it. The main reason being that I find it really difficult to go from a mindset of looking for undervalued companies that are attractive investment opportunities to a mindset where you are looking for exactly the opposite.

I'm not averse to short selling it's just that I have found more opportunities on the long side and that haven't really seen the need to do any serious work on it.

I also don't find the pay-offs of short selling that compelling. Unlimited losses with limited profit.

 


Do you have a question you would like to ask? Write me a quick note using our Contact Page.


Regards


Tim du Toit

PS Last week I mentioned that I was going to buy the program program "Mentored by a Millionaire" and bought the MP3 version and really like it so far.


Its hard to argue with these:

"Steve Scott's audio program is the most effective and practical of all the success and mentoring programs I have listened to. He is engaging in his presentation and clear in the steps one must take to achieve one's vision. This program goes beyond motivation. It provides a strategic framework to achieve and succeed. I highly recommend it. It has truly changed my life." - Dr. G. Spurrier


"I just finished "Mentored by a Millionaire" and I must say that this program is not "One" of the best program I ever heard on this topic but "IS" the absolute best.
The material is not read but delivered in a very lively fashion....it's like attending a real seminar. It's fast paced, entertaining, keeps your attention and is interesting til the end. Highly recommend it. Great job Steven K. Scott. Thank you for sharing!"
- Luisa Bernoni

Click here to find out more 

 


Highly Recommended

 
Should you invest in great international companies or concentrate on the country you live in?

Why choose?

At Eurosharelab, our market-beating Alert Portfolio is currently invested in six international companies. These companies comprise the very best value opportunities we can find in our broad world of investing:

  • French and German telecommunications companies paying dividends of more than 7%
  • a small US branded consumer goods company with high profit margins paying a dividend of more than 6%.
  • a US natural gas company optimally positioned to profit from higher natural gas prices with entrepreneurial incentivised owner managers
  • a UK based property company founded to profit from the meltdown of UK commercial property prices with owner managers that have personally made two fortunes already by investing in UK property
  • a UK automobile accident repair company unfairly sold down by the market to absolute bargain price levels with a strong balance sheet paying a dividend of over 6%

Click here to learn more
 
 

Worth Reading

 
Jeff Borack in his blog A Ship in the Harbor is Safe... wrote an excellent article on the Containerised Shipping market.


In the article Earnings into Focus  
Albert Andrews, strategist of Société Générale, provides an interesting graph showing the run-up in the US forward PE has not been accompanied by higher expectations of long-term earnings growth. “This means the equity market is far more reliant on the expectations for strong 2010 growth being fulfilled, said Andrews.

 
The Financial Times in the article Britain’s unsavoury debt mire again focuses the attention UK's huge amount of leverage. A study by McKinsey estimated that private and public debt in he UK is already at 449% of GBP. Maybe England is really just a giant hedge-fund?


According toThe Economist 2010 is the year newspapers will begin to start charging for content. It will be interesting to see what happens. I have a yearly subscription to the Financial Times which is more than worth it. I am however not sure if I will be willing to subscribe to a lot more publications.


According to Spiegel Online the German Government Plans to Crack Down on Rating Agencies

 

 
 
Websites by Simplweb