What are your favourite valuation metrics? | Print |

 

Dear Fellow Investor

 

I do not know about you, but as time goes by I appreciate the work of remarkable people more and more. 

It allows me to start any subject as a complete beginner, but over a short period of time end up as someone with a good or even great fundamental knowledge of any subject by reading a few books.

 
A major part, practical experience, is still missing, but just imagine what we would have to go through if we did not have access to the knowledge at all.
 
Anything we would start would be from absolutely nothing.
 
A good example would be the development of my investment process.
 
At the above link you will find a time-line of my investment experience but here are the main points:

 

  • I started out with a basic correspondence course on the stock market in 1986
  • I lost money I pooled with my father using technical analysis
  • I listened to brokers and lost more money chasing the hottest stocks while trading a lot
  • I discovered a book Winning on the JSE by the mathematician Karl Posel that gave me a framework for finding, evaluating, buying and selling undervalued investments.
  • From there I went on to read Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, David Dreman and many more.
 
My investment process thus moved from a process with no proven evidence of success to one that has substantial proven success in the form of many successful investors.
 
All of this through reading and doing.
 
 
Over time my investment process has moved from the use of a few basic financial ratios to longer check-lists.
 
Until recently my favourite valuation metrics were:
  • Price to earnings ratio (“PE”) the lower the better
  • Price to book ration (“PB”) also the lower the better and
  • Debt to equity where I prefer companies with less than 35%
 
However that changed when, in 2008 I read a book by Joel Greenblatt called The Little Book that Beats the Market. Here is a good review.
 
The book suggests the use of two ratios, one to identify good companies that earn high returns on assets and a second ratio to identify cheap or undervalued companies.
 
Since reading the book these two ratios have become the main valuation metrics I use.
 
 
To identify good companies

 

Ratio 1 = EBIT / (Working Capital + net fixed assets + short term debt)
 
The higher this ratio the better. Higher means the company earns a high return on its total assets, fixed assets as well as working capital.
 
Where:
EBIT = Earnings before interest and taxes
Working capital = Current assets – current liabilities
Net fixed assets = Total fixed assets – depreciation (Excludes goodwill and other intangible assets)

 
To Identify undervalued companies

 

 Ratio 2 = EBIT / Enterprise Value
 
As with the first ration a higher value here is also better. Higher means you are paying less for the company in relation to the profit it generates.
 
Enterprise value is calculated as follows
= market capitalisation (number of shares * current share price) + debt – cash
Enterprise value thus expresses the value of the company to you as a private buyer of the whole company.
 
Firstly you pay for the market capitalisation plus the debt, which you have to repay, minus any available cash you can use to reduce the company's debt or pay out to yourself to lower the purchase price.
 
The added advantage of using Enterprise Value is that it already incorporates the debt and cash the company has on its balance sheet. So you do not separately have to evaluate the amount of debt the company carries.
 
 
What are your favourite valuation metrics? Let me know in a short mail and I will add it to the article.
 

Have you signed up for my free weekly newsletter "Investing that makes sense" yet?

Sign up now and receive articles like this in your inbox weekly.

And if you sign up now you will also receive a 10 page free bonus report - Enhanced Checklist for Equity Investors - with over 30 proven checklist items to improve your investment returns.

 

I respect your privacy - Privacy Policy 

 
 
Profitable investing
 
 
Tim du Toit
 

Readers comments

 

Excellent addition from AV in Italy

My valuation metrics are:

  1. EV \ EBIT (Greenblatt tools)

  2. ROCE (Greenbelt tools)

  3. Then I like to check EV\Cash Flow (just in case that EBIT is not representative for some industries) and Capex \ Cash Flow (show me the money)

  4. Average ROCE for the last 5 years (is the ROCE sustainable?)

  5. Average EV\EBIT for the last 5 years (is it a value trap or a low margin sector?)

  6. Debt\Equity

  7. 5 years compound average growth rate for sales, book value and EBIT (is the company growing?and is it better than competitors?)

  8. EBIT margin and comparison vs competitors

 

EV – Enterprise value (market capitalisation + debt – cash)

EBIT – Earnings before interest and taxes

ROCA – Return on capital employed (EBIT / (total equity + long term debt))

Cash flow – Cash from operations – capital expenditure

Capex - Capital expenditure

EBIT margin – EBIT / Sales

 

P.S.   A company the market forgot about

Last month while running my stock screeners to find attractively valued companies I stumbled onto something that will interest you.

As you know I look for the absolute cheapest companies in Europe, the UK and the USA, irrespective of size and market they are trading on.

This time however I discovered “a gem lying in plain sight”.

It’s a really large company (that you can buy nearly anywhere) that has gotten really cheap. But is so large and obvious that it is completely overlooked by the market.

Something like a diamond lying on the sidewalk, you do not believe that it is a diamond and thus ignore it as you walk by.

Another reason I like the company it that it recently got rid of quite a large millstone around its neck, another factor that should help it perform better in future.

I immediately analysed the company and recommended it to my subscribers.


To find out how you can also get ideas like this monthly click here.

 
 
Websites by Simplweb