|
In
this article we would like to explain that “Growth Investing” and
“Value Investing” are not dissimilar theories or approaches of
investing.
It
is thus not correct to talk of growth vs value investing but rather
to ask how do the two approaches to investing fit together.
All
profitable investing, as this article will show, is in fact value
investing as growth is just one of the factors to consider when
calculating if a share is attractively priced.
Charlie
Munger, Warren Buffett’s business partner sums the Value vs Growth
investing debate up as follows:
“The
whole concept of dividing it up into ‘value’ and ‘growth’
strikes me as twaddle. It’s convenient for a bunch of pension fund
consultants to get fees prattling about and a way for one adviser to
distinguish himself from another. But to me, all intelligent
investing is value investing.”
Warren
Buffett spoke of growth vs value investing in a softer tone when he
said:
“The
two approaches are joined at the hip: Growth is always a component in
the calculation of value, constituting a variable whose importance
can range from negligible to enormous and whose impact can be
negative as well as positive.”
What
is Growth Investing?
Philip
Fisher (1907-2004) was one of the greatest investment minds in
history.
Working
from a modest office on the West Coast in the aftermath of the Great
Depression, he developed a buy-and-hold value and growth model for
investments.
In
addition to teaching at the Stanford School of Business, he authored
several books including the excellent book “Common Stocks and
Uncommon Profits”.
According
to Fisher growth investing is a style of investment where investors
invest in companies that exhibit signs of above-average growth in
revenue or profits or both. Growth investors invest in these
companies even if the share price appears expensive in terms of
valuation metrics such as price-to-earning or price-to-book ratios.
What
is Value Investing?
Benjamin
Graham (1894-1976) was an American economist and professional
investor and is considered the father of Value Investing, an
investment approach he began taught at Columbia Business School.
Warren
Buffett is a former student of Graham’s and credits him with
providing him with the investment frame of reference that made him
successful.
In
1949 Graham wrote a famous book, “The Intelligent Investor”. It
has been revised many times and is still in print.
Value
investing involves buying the shares of companies that are
attractively priced compared to intrinsic or calculated value.
Examples
of such undervaluation may be public companies that trade at
discounts to book value or tangible book value, have high dividend
yields or have low price-to-earning multiples.
A
comparison of Growth vs Value Investing models
Warren
Buffet considers Fisher’s book “Common Stocks and Uncommon
Profits” on a par with Graham’s “The Intelligent Investor”.
The
following table compares Fisher’s 15-point guide to successful
investing with the principles of Value Investing, according to Graham
and refined by Buffett.
Question
to ask about companies according to the respective investment
strategies:
|
Growth Investing |
Value Investing |
-
Does the company have
products or services with sufficient market potential to make a
sizeable increase in sales for at least several years possible? |
Yes |
-
Does the management
have a determination to continue to develop products or processes
that will further increase total sales potential when the growth
potential of currently attractive product lines have been
exploited? |
Yes |
-
How effective is the
company’s research and development efforts in relation to its
size? |
Yes |
-
Does the company have
an above-average sales organisation? |
Yes |
-
Does
the company have an attractive profit margin? |
Yes |
-
What
is the company doing to maintain or improve profit
margins? |
Yes |
-
Does the company have
good labour and personnel relations? |
Yes |
-
Does the company have
good executive management? |
Yes |
-
Does the company have
depth of management? |
Yes |
-
How good are the
company’s cost analysis and accounting controls? |
Yes |
-
Are there other
peculiar aspects of the business that will give the investor
important clues as to how the company will fare in relation to
its competition? |
Yes |
-
Does the company have
attractive short-range or long-range outlook in regard to
profits? |
Yes |
-
Will the growth of the
company require sufficient financing so that the increased number
of shares then outstanding will largely cancel existing
shareholders’ benefit from this expected growth? |
Yes |
-
Does the management
talk freely to investors about its affairs when things are going
well and “clam up” when troubles or disappointments occur? |
Yes |
-
Does the company have
a management of unquestioned integrity? |
Yes |
As
can be seen Growth and Value Investing is one and the same approach
to investing. They look at the same factors and ask the same
questions.
Growth,
in terms of sales, operating profit, pre-tax profit, net income, is
just a factor to be considered in the valuation of a security. The
higher the growth the more an investor would be willing to pay for
the company.
It
is thus not question of growth vs value investing but rather how much
growth is priced into the current share price and how does that
compare with your best estimate of the company's growth?
If
your assessment of growth is higher than assumed by the current share
price the share should be purchased.
Have you signed up for my free weekly newsletter "Investing that makes sense" yet?
Sign up now and receive
articles like this in your inbox weekly.
And if you sign up now you will also receive a
10 page free bonus report - Enhanced Checklist for Equity Investors - with over
30 proven checklist items to improve your investment returns.
I respect your privacy - Privacy
Policy
Additional Value Investing Articles
Benjamin
Graham on Value Investing
Warren
Buffett on Value Investing
What
is Value Investing
Back to our Resource
Page
P. S. You simply have to invest when you find a good company in the software industry.
Here’s why.
A software company, once its development and fixed costs are covered, generates just about pure profit on each additional sale as the cost to produce an additional CD is virtually zero.
This month I stumbled onto exactly such a company when searching for an investment to recommend to my subscribers.
The company is trading at a price to earnings ratio of under 12. I agree this does not seem like a bargain but remember 2009 was a difficult year for all companies.
The company is even cheaper based on its price to free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital investment) of 8.7 times. This means the theoretical dividend the company can pay with the cash it generates is nearly 11.5%.
The only valuation measure (I look at 7) the company is not cheap on is its dividend yield of only 2.1%. This is due to it using cash to pay down debt taken on to pay for an acquisition.
But as the debt is nearly all repaid there is a lot of room for a substantial increase.
To find out how you can also get ideas like this monthly click here.
|